Sponsored by
Every week another headline says AI is taking the jobs.
Then Gallup went and asked the people it actually happened to.
Of the people who had been laid off, 1% said AI was the main reason. One percent.
The top three answers were restructuring, budget cuts, and the economy. The same three answers as every downturn since the seventies.
So the fear is real. The cause is mostly something older and more boring.
Unify Your Teams and Tech Stack With HubSpot
Connect your customer data, teams, and tools without the hassle of complex integrations or lengthy setups. One easy platform gives marketing, sales, and service teams a unified customer view and the tools to turn it into growth.
Why HubSpot and what's new
• Generate leads and automate marketing with Marketing Hub
• Build your pipeline and close more deals with Sales Hub
• Scale customer support and drive retention with Service Hub
• Keep customer data clean, connected, and actionable with one, unified platform
Join 306,000+ in over 135 countries using HubSpot to grow their businesses.
See what a more connected approach to growth can do for you and your team. Get setup quickly and start checking off your hardest tasks.
The real reasons people got laid off
Gallup put this to 23,717 employed US adults in February 2026. Actual people with jobs, not a panel of pundits.
Among those who had been laid off, the reasons came back like this:
Organisational restructuring, 15%
Budget and cost cutting, 11%
Economic conditions, 11%
AI or automation, 1%
Meanwhile plenty of companies are naming AI as the reason in their press releases. Both things are true at once, which tells you something about press releases.
Regular AI users got laid off far less
Same study, less comfortable finding.
62% of the laid-off group were AI non-users, people who touched it once a year or less. Among those still employed, that number was 50%.
In tech the gap was wider. Gallup put the odds of being laid off at roughly 6% for people using AI at least monthly, against roughly 18% for people using it less than that.
Here's my read, and you're welcome to disagree. That gap isn't AI replacing anyone, it's a proxy. The people who reach for new tools tend to be the people closest to whatever their company is actually trying to do this year, and that's who comes through a restructure.
Find the part of your work someone pays for
While everyone argues about jobs being destroyed, small businesses are quietly paying people to set this stuff up, because they cannot do it themselves and they know it.
So the question worth an hour of your Saturday isn't whether AI takes your job, it's which part of what you already do somebody would pay for.
Here's a prompt that answers it properly. Give it real detail, including the boring things.
You're a blunt business advisor. Help me find the part of my work someone would pay for.
Here is what I actually do in a normal week:
[list 10 things, including the boring admin and the favours you do for other people]
Here are the AI tools I use, and what I use them for:
[list them honestly, even if it's just one]
For each item on my list, tell me:
1. Would a small business pay someone to do this? Yes or no, and what kind of business specifically.
2. If yes, is it a one-off job, a monthly service, or something I could build once and sell more than once?
3. What would I need to show them to be taken seriously.
Then pick the three strongest, rank them by how quickly I could find a first buyer, and tell me plainly which ones are weak and why.The answers get uncomfortable in a useful way. Most people find the sellable thing is something they've been doing for free for about a year.
Turn the answer into something Claude remembers
Put that output in a Claude Project instead of leaving it in a chat you'll lose by Tuesday.
Every later conversation about pricing, outreach, or a sales page then starts from a Claude that already knows what you sell and who buys it. That one file is the difference between starting over every time and building on something.
You can run this today, and it costs nothing.
Deciding what to charge for what comes back is the part that stalls people.
That's the whole second half, and it's where everything I make now lives.
Quick one.
What came out top of your list? Hit reply, I read them all.
Talk soon,
Zephyr
