Sponsored by
Some decisions rattle around your head for weeks.
Take the job or stay. Hire or wait. Raise prices or hold. Move or don't.
You talk to a friend, read a few articles, make a pros-and-cons list that somehow makes it worse.
With the newest Claude, you have something better available. A tireless advisor that reasons through the whole thing with you, and refuses to just tell you what you want to hear.
Now a word from today's sponsor:
Expense receipts shouldn't require a search party
Adam spent 20 minutes looking for a $36 receipt. His finance team sent three Slack messages. Someone made a sticky note.
Ramp would have matched it automatically the moment he swiped. Auto-coded, in-policy, synced. Nobody had to ask Adam for anything.
This is what finance looks like when it runs itself.
Your team can be Adam. Or they can not be Adam.
Okay, why this works now.
Opus 5, the model I covered on Tuesday, is genuinely good at reasoning. Weighing tradeoffs, spotting what you've missed, holding several angles at once.
That's exactly what a hard decision needs. A clear head, not a cheerleader.
The trick is to stop it from simply agreeing with you. Left alone, AI is a people-pleaser. You have to explicitly ask it to challenge you.
Here's the prompt I use. Turn the effort up first if you can, then paste this:
Be my decision advisor on this. Your job is to help me think clearly, not to make me feel good.
The decision: [what you're deciding, in full.]
Where I'm at: [the options, the facts, and honestly, which way I'm leaning and why.]
Do four things:
1. Lay out the real case for each option, fairly, even the one I'm resisting.
2. Name the blind spots and biases I'm probably falling into.
3. Ask me the three questions I most need to answer before deciding.
4. Then give me your honest read, and tell me how confident you are.
Push back on me where I'm being soft or wishful.Read what comes back slowly.
The real value is what it surfaces. The questions you'd been avoiding. The angles you couldn't see from inside your own head.
Then go deeper. Argue with it. Answer its questions out loud. Say "you're wrong about that, here's why." It sharpens with the pushback.
One honest limit. It doesn't have to live with the outcome. You do.
So use it to think, not to decide. The final call, the one only you can carry, stays yours. That's the whole point.
But most bad decisions come from murky thinking, not bad luck. Clear the murk and you choose better.
Claude can be a real thinking partner on the big calls in your work. That's one of the quieter, more powerful things I teach in Claude Mastery.
Step by step, no tech background needed.
Quick one.
What decision have you been circling? Hit reply, I read every one.
Talk soon,
Zephyr
